Quote from HSCIN on 05/02/09 at 8:56am:Political differences aside, I believe the school funding cut will ultimately be Petelos' undoing at the state level. Politicians are always looking for the Achilles heel to take their opponent down. I believe the school funding cut is Petelos' Achilles heel.
Oddly poetic.
And please don't refer to Obama as "my" president. He is "the" president. Word is still out on whether I'll claim him. Most folks don't know this, but I'm actually a conservative. Always have been.
Conservative fiscal policy. Moderate social policy. I haven't seen anybody who fits "my" bill yet.
You're making the assumption that most people vote with their brain and vote on the issues. I would beg to differ with you on that. Most people vote on emotion and on the candidate's charisma - is he likeable.
Take a look at the last five presidents:
Reagan vs. Carter: Reagan was clearly the more charismatic of the two.
Bush vs. Dukakis: Dukakis was too much of a stoic individual, had zero personality. People were turned off by this.
Clinton vs. Bush: Say what you want about Bubba, when it came to charisma, he had it. He made people forget about the issues.
Bush vs. Gore: A tree has a better personality than Al Gore, but it was a close one.
Obama vs. McCain:
"I have a gift..." We don't know what's going to happen next year and who is going to run. We know Davis is. We know Petelos is thinking about it. We know
Barkley is a drunk who would never make it. But we don't know who else is going to run.
Tony Petelos runs circles around Artur Davis when it comes to charisma. He is well liked by most of his constituents and issues like school funding are secondary - those are "brain issues" not "emotion issues". Obama is a prime example that most people don't vote with their brain, they vote with their heart. (Exception: when you are disappointed about who you voted for because he/she didn't come through as you thought they would. This is where charisma takes a back seat. Obama will find this out next election as he becomes another 1-Termer, like Carter and Bush 41.)
But it's early and so much more is to come. But an interesting discussion, nonetheless.